The succession to the Awujale throne in Ijebu-Ode, Ogun State, nigeria has entered a contentious stage following the passing of Oba Sikiru Kayode Adetona, who ruled for an impressive 65 years. Reports have emerged suggesting that the council of chiefs may move to disqualify six leading aspirants from the selection process. Among those at risk of exclusion are senior palace chiefs (otunbas) and members of the Omo-Oba, the recognized royal lineage, a development observers have described as unprecedented and highly controversial. The situation raises serious questions about transparency, fairness, and adherence to customary norms.
Traditionally, the Awujale stool rotates among four established ruling houses: Anikinaiya, Fidipote, Fusengbuwa, and Gbelegbuwa. Only male descendants from these houses are eligible for consideration, in line with Yoruba kingship traditions. These rules are also reinforced by the Ogun State Chiefs Law of 1957 and subsequent official chieftaincy regulations. The rotational system is intended to maintain equity among royal lineages and prevent disputes over succession.
Sources indicate that some prominent chiefs, including Kakanfo, Madasa, and Lapoekun, may have attempted to influence the selection of candidates through the interregnum council and other kingmakers. Allegations suggest undue pressure and inducements, which, if proven, could compromise the integrity of the succession process. The Ogun State government has reportedly received petitions concerning these activities and may consider removing implicated chiefs from the official kingmakers’ list for 2026.
The Awujale stool carries influence beyond Ijebu-Ode, with national significance attached to the selection of a successor. Late Oba Adetona maintained strong connections with political leaders, including President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, who reportedly values a candidate with integrity, focus, and respect for tradition. Tinubu’s personal ties to Ijebu-Isonyin further underscore the importance of selecting a leader capable of upholding the stool’s dignity while ensuring local governance stability.
Observers warn that attempts to disqualify multiple aspirants without transparent procedures could invite legal challenges, national scrutiny, and erosion of public trust in traditional institutions. Upholding the rotational system and statutory requirements is seen as essential for maintaining legitimacy, stability, and community confidence in the succession process.
Reports Beyond the Mainstream 